Dear Los Angeles City Council...
Discriminating against the unvaccinated will not help to end the pandemic. Full stop.
I'm writing to express my dismay and outrage that the Los Angeles City Counsel is going forward with banning the vaccinated from indoor businesses. This is blatant discrimination and a gross violation of the Constitution. There is no substantive argument for what you are doing.
But first, just to get it out of the way, I am not an anti-vaxxer. I fully support tried-and-tested vaccines that have existed for decades and continue to prevent outbreaks of illnesses like measles and small pox.
I am also a pro-thinker who recognizes that the merits of each individual vaccine must be independently considered rather than presuming that all vaccines are always safe 100% of the time.
KEY EVIDENCED FACTS:
Those who are vaccinated or unvaccinated can carry the same viral load.
The vaccines do not prevent infection and were never even designed to prevent infection
Much of the illness now might actually be coming from the vaccines themselves, not the virus.
Leaky vaccines increase the rate of mutation, ensuring the development of more variants.
90% of those hospitalized in Israel are fully vaccinated (including 14 who had a third booster shot!)
In the UK there are higher death and hospitalization rates among the vaccinated compared to unvaccinated persons
More people in Australia have actually died from vaccine-induced illness than from Covid itself
Natural antibodies from those previously infected have superior protection over vaccine-induced antibodies and should absolutely not vaccinate.
With all of this in mind, there is also the reality that none of these vaccines have completed phase 3 safety trials. This isn't something to take lightly. This means anyone currently being vaccinated is part of the phase 3 trial. It's not hyperbolic to say this is a mass experiment being done on the population and without informed consent. Vaccine hesitancy is rational.
PROOF:
MODERNA: Phase 3 Trial Completion date >>> Oct 2022 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04470427
PFIZER: Phase 3 Trial completion date >>> May 2023 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04368728
ILLEGAL COERCION
Yet the L.A. City Council, despite all of the above data and information, is still moving forward with restrictions?? Instituting any coercive measures, including banning the unvaccinated from indoor businesses or otherwise making life "difficult" completely discounts the short-term and long-term risks associated with experimental drugs that have incomplete safety profiles for a disease that we are already well-protected from.
The overall risk of death for those infected with Covid-19 remains in the 1-2% range and nearly all had co-morbidities or were elderly or both. Out of the 606,389 Americans who have died (as of August 4, 2021), the % by age group breaks down is as follows (SOURCE):
0-17 - - - - - 0.057% (SHOULD NOT VACCINATE)
18-29 - - - - 0.415% (SHOULD NOT VACCINATE)
30-39 - - - - 1.190% (SHOULD NOT VACCINATE)
40-49 - - - - 3.160% (SHOULD NOT VACCINATE)
50-64 - - - - 15.99% (SHOULD CONSIDER VACCINATING)
65-74 - - - - 22.31% (SHOULD CONSIDER VACCINATING)
75-84 - - - - 27.32% (SHOULD CONSIDER VACCINATING)
85 + - - - - - 29.53% (SHOULD CONSIDER VACCINATING)
THIS ISN’T SMALL POX
That killed 30% of those infected. Covid-19 still has only a 1-2% death rate. The math simply does not warrant black/white, one-size-fits-all strategies for all ages. And since these vaccines don't prevent infection or transmissibility and are likely contributing to more variants due to not stopping the spread, what are you doing this for? What is the point of trying to coerce the unvaccinated into getting injected? I'd really like to know the reasoning behind this. What should prevail is reason, not virtue-signaling idiocy.
REJECT MEDICAL APARTHEID
If you pass these fascist rules for Los Angeles County, banning the unvaccinated from indoor businesses, there will be rioting. I know because I'm in contact with a variety of organizations and we are ready to go.
The unvaccinated and vaccinated equally carry/transmit the virus. That's a fact. It's also true that unless you stop the spread you cannot use these vaccines to end the pandemic. It's not possible and it never was. The vaccines do not achieve this objective.
So unless you can disprove that then treating the unvaccinated as second rate citizens will be considered an assault on our most basic liberties. The government has no substantive basis to intervene or otherwise influence our personal medical decisions. This is not about science or health anymore, as the evidence above makes abundantly clear. This is about a totalitarian thirst for power and control. And it will not be tolerated.
If you think we don't have your personal addresses, those are still public information. How much civil disobedience in your driveways can you and your family really tolerate? Tread lightly, Council members.
Remember who you serve.
Sincerely,
David A. Bond